vs. Budgets
Actuals vs. Budgets, an important concept for financial managers to understand when planning, managing, and evaluating operations and financial performance, encompasses the comparison between the amounts actually incurred in a given activity with the amounts budgeted for that activity. Actuals and budgets are used to generate assessments of costs, rates, and metrics at various intervals so that forecasts can be adjusted accordingly to better predict expected results. It’s important to understand that while actuals and budgets may diverge in the short-term, they should align in the long-term.
Defining Actuals and Budgets
Actuals refer to the actual amount of money spent on an activity or item over a certain period of time. For example, an organization may track the actual amounts spent on employee expenses over the course of a month. Budget, on the other hand, refers to the estimated amount of money to be spent on a particular activity or item. For example, if an organization budgets for employee expenses to be $1,000 for the month, then that is the amount they expect to spend on those expenses.
Comparing Actuals to Budgets
Financial managers should compare actuals with budgets to identify variances and discrepancies that occur from the expected or planned values. Understanding these variances can be crucial in guiding decisions and assessing risk. For instance, a financial manager may use the comparison of actuals to budgets to identify opportunities to further reduce costs, or they may use this information to revise forecasts and adjust operations accordingly. It is worth noting, however, that variances do not necessarily need to be addressed right away. Many financial managers would benefit from understanding why the actuals differ from the budgets as this may provide insight into future trends or areas for improvement.
Key Points to Consider
When comparing actuals vs. budgets, financial managers should consider the following:
• Are the actuals exceeding the budget? If so, why?
• Are the actuals falling below the budget? If so, why?
• Is the budget accurate and achievable? If not, what measures need to be taken to adjust it?
• What measures can be taken to reduce costs and stay within budget?
• What factors may be creating discrepancies between the actuals and the budget?
• How can trends in the actuals and budgets be used to inform future decisions and optimize performance?
Example
An organization may develop a budget that allocates $100,000 for employee salaries. After 3 months of operation, the organization’s actuals in terms of employee salaries come out to $90,000. In this case, the financial manager may use this comparison to identify a discrepancy between the actuals and the budget. With a deeper understanding of the issue, the financial manager can then explore strategies to optimize employee salaries and make sure they remain within the allocated budget.
Conclusion
Comparing actuals vs. budgets can be a powerful and insightful tool for financial managers, allowing them to identify discrepancies, understand trends, and inform decisions accordingly. Doing so can significantly improve the accuracy and validity of forecasts, and help an organization stay within budget and reach their financial goals.
« Back to Glossary Index